Glossary

A case presentation is a formal communication between health care professionals (e.g., physicians, pharmacists, nurses, therapists, nutritionists) providing a synthesis of a patient's clinical information. Components of a case presentation typically include identifying information, reason for consultation/admission, chief complaint (in the patient's own words), recent history, active medical problems, medications, allergies, social history, physical examination findings, relevant test results, assessment, and treatment plans.

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Connect is a freely available web-based platform, including an authoring tool and a repository, enabling the CDS community to identify evidence-based care, translate and codify information into an interoperable health information technology standard, and leverage tooling to promote a collaborative model of CDS development.

*Note: On April 28th, 2025, AHRQ’s CDS Connect went offline. An updated, likely final version of its authoring tool has been developed by the HL7® community as CDS Connect Community Edition. A newer set of tools, the open source CQL Studio, is an integrated web application suite for developing, testing, and publication of CQL- and FHIR-based artifacts that can be developed into computable guidelines, CDS, or dQMs, providing a functional superset of capabilities.

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Hooks is a specification developed by Health Level Seven International® (HL7®) and managed by its CDS Work Group. It enables near real-time decision support to be integrated directly into a clinician’s electronic health record workflow.

When a specified event occurs within the clinician’s workflow, it triggers a CDS service. The service then securely retrieves the necessary data elements using HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®) services. By leveraging FHIR standards, CDS Hooks supports interoperability among stakeholders operating across different systems and platforms.

The Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL) is an authoritative list of health IT products that have been tested and certified under the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) Health IT Certification Program. Products listed on the CHPL are tested by an ONC-Authorized Testing Laboratory (ONC-ATL) and certified by an ONC-Authorized Certification Body (ONC-ACB) to meet criteria adopted by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

For additional information on how to navigate the CHPL, please refer to the Training/User Guide linked on https://chpl.healthit.gov/.

ClinFHIR is an open-source tool providing an educational environment and also allows health information technology developers to create or search for Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®)-based resources. It serves as a training tool to help people wanting to learn more about FHIR visualize how the parts combine to represent clinical information in a structured and coded manner. It also serves as a development tool with features to build some of the required artifacts, particularly as an aid to learning.

Clinical decision support is health information technology functionality building upon the foundation of an electronic health record to provide persons involved in care processes with general and person-specific information, intelligently filtered and organized, at appropriate times, to enhance health and health care.

Clinical decision support alert fatigue occurs when a clinician, after receiving too many alerts or reminders, begins to override or ignore further alerts without attending to them, thus potentially decreasing the care improvements expected from the tools.

The most commonly implemented clinical decision support (CDS) alerts prompt clinicians about guidance, e.g., drug-allergy, drug-drug, and drug-disease warnings, or provide dosing guidance. Passive CDS includes order sets, patient data reports, and documentation templates while active CDS includes rules and alerts usually delivered through computerized provider order entry or other functions of the electronic health records.

A clinical decision support (CDS) developer is an individual or organization that translates knowledge to a structured and/or executable tool aiding in making evidence-informed decisions about a patient’s health care. CDS developers may or may not be the original knowledge authors (e.g., guideline developers, subject matter experts) or the final implementers. They ensure accurate and consistent reflection of the original clinical knowledge in the appropriate standard coding schemes (e.g., Clinical Quality Language and terminologies such as Current Procedural Terminology and SNOMED CT), accounting appropriately for intellectual property and licensing.

Clinical decision support (CDS) implementation activities refer to configuration, customization, and other needed steps for health information technologies to function for a specific organization or group of end-users. For example, with CDS, the local implementation will consider end-user workflows to identify the points at which to present the CDS, determine which data fields in local databases will map to data fields that drive the CDS, and educate end-users about important features of the CDS. Typically, this involves translation of guideline recommendations from L3 to L4 or other local adaptation (localization) (See Levels of knowledge representation for CPG).

Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) is a popular, flexible markup standard developed by Health Level Seven International® defining the structure of certain patient medical records, such as discharge summaries and progress notes, as a way to better exchange this information between health care providers and patients. Wallask, S. (n.d.). Clinical document architecture (CDA). TechTarget: Health IT. Retrieved March 12, 2024, from https://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/Clinical-Document-Architecture-CDA

Clinical information systems "are computer systems that provide immediate access to current patient data regarding clinical notes, medication history, laboratory reports, images, and reports either directly or via data networks. They are parts of a hospital information system, which facilitates direct patient care." Islam, M. M., Poly, T. N., & Li, Y-C. J. (2018). Recent advancement of clinical information systems: Opportunities and challenges. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 27(1), 83–90. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0038-1667075

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist clinician and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. CPGs are statements that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care. They are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2011). Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Institute of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK209539.pdf  

A clinical quality measure (CQM) is a mechanism used for assessing the degree to which a clinician competently and safely delivers clinical services appropriate for the patient in an optimal time frame. CQMs are a subset of the broader category of quality measures.

CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) is the repository of record for information about CMS quality measures. CMS and its partners use the inventory to inform stakeholders, manage its measure portfolio, and guide measure development. The functions allow users to find measures quickly, compile and refine sets of related measures, identify measures across the continuum of care, and help coordinate measurement efforts across all conditions, settings, and populations.

The CMS consensus-based entity (CBE) assigns the CMS CBE identification number to a measure that has successfully gone through the CBE endorsement process. The CMS CBE Submission Tool and Repository (STAR) is the database of record of CBE-endorsed measures. 

The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to contract with a consensus-based entity (CBE) regarding performance measurement. The CMS CBE endorses quality measures through a transparent, consensus-based process incorporating feedback from diverse groups of interested parties to foster health care quality improvement.

The CBE also convenes multi-interested party groups to discuss the Measures Under Consideration List as part of the pre-rulemaking process and reviews CMS's existing measure portfolio for possible change recommendations.

The CMS Data Element Library (DEL) is the centralized resource for CMS assessment instrument data elements (e.g. questions and responses) and their associated health information technology standards. It currently includes CMS's post acute care assessment instruments.

When a measure developer creates a new electronic clinical quality measure in the Measure Authoring Development Integrated Environment (MADiE), MADiE assigns the CMS eCQM identification to the new measure. The CMS eCQM ID is an essential data element when submitting eCQM data to CMS.

A CMS Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification ID is a number generated by the Certified Health Information Technology (IT) Product List (CHPL) and used for reporting to CMS. It represents a single product or combination of products in the CHPL. The CMS EHR Certification ID is different from the CHPL product number. In the CHPL, this is the number generated when the hospital/clinician selects EHR Certification ID for a suite of products making up the hospital's/clinician's EHR solution. If a product changes, then a different CMS EHR Certification ID will be generated. The CMS EHR Certification ID is only unique to the product suite. If two different hospitals/clinicians happen to use the same products, then they will both have the same CMS EHR Certification ID.

CMS requires the CMS EHR Certification ID in several of its quality reporting programs. Check with individual quality reporting programs for requirements.

The CMS Measures Under Consideration Entry/Review Information Tool (CMS MERIT) is the web-based data collection portal allowing measure developers to submit candidate measures to CMS for consideration. The Tool walks the submitter through the process of providing information. Each submitter has a dashboard allowing them to track the progress of their submitted measure and to communicate with CMS through the comment function. The Tool also provides a view of all measures submitted for the current year. Another purpose of CMS MERIT is to give federal officials, the consensus-based entity multi-stakeholder groups, and other stakeholders more information as they review measures.

The CMS Measures Management System (MMS) Hub is a centralized website for quality‑measure guidance, tools, and engagement opportunities across the measure lifecycle from conceptualization, specification, testing, implementation, and ongoing maintenance.

The CMS Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA) Implementation Guides (IGs) are technical documents that define the standards and specifications for reporting electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) using Health Level Seven International® (HL7®) QRDA. The guides provide detailed instructions for healthcare providers, health information technology (IT) vendors, and reporting organizations on how to format and submit eCQM data consistently and accurately.

The CMS QRDA Category I guide covers individual patient–level reports and is used by hospitals for quality reporting programs. The CMS QRDA Category III guide covers aggregate-level reports for groups of patients and is used by eligible clinicians for quality reporting programs.

The CMS Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA) Pre-Submission Validation Tools are software resources designed to help healthcare providers, health information technology (IT) vendors, and reporting organizations verify the accuracy and compliance of their electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) submissions before formally submitting them to CMS. By acting as a pre-submission check, these tools help ensure that eCQM QRDA files meet CMS standards, reducing errors, saving time, and supporting reliable quality reporting.

CMS-supported validation tools include:

• Cypress: Ensures accurate, standardized, and compliant eCQM reporting, reducing the risk of rejected submissions and improving data quality for CMS quality reporting programs. Cypress validates both QRDA Category I (patient-level) and Category III (aggregate-level) files for compliance.
• Hospital Quality Reporting System (HQR): Checks QRDA Category I (patient-level) files for adherence to CMS standards and Health Level Seven International® (HL7®) specifications. It provides reports and guidance to help hospitals identify and correct errors prior to submission.

Code repositories are a file archive and web hosting facility providing secure storage for code and version control. 

A code system is a managed collection of concepts with each concept represented by at least one internally unique code and a human readable description, e.g., SNOMED CT.

A coding system is the symbolic arrangement of data or instructions in a computer program or the set of such instructions.

A comment period is the period of time the public has to respond to a request for public comment, such as a proposed rule, Request for Information, a new measure posted on the Measures Management System Hub, or some other document. The Administrative Procedure Act requires federal agencies to give the public an opportunity to participate in rulemaking. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 provide guidance noting a comment period generally should be no less than 60 days, but the length of the comment period varies if not part of the rulemaking process.

A composite measure is a measure containing two or more individual measures, resulting in a single measure with a single score.

Computable care guidelines are the expression of and sharing of health care guidelines in a grammar understood by a software application. Integrating the Health Enterprise. (n.d.). Computable care guidelines. Retrieved March 12, 2024, from https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Computable_Care_Guidelines

Concept maps are visual representations of information that can take the form of charts, graphic organizers, tables, flowcharts, Venn Diagrams, timelines, or T-charts. The Learning Center - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (n.d.). Concept maps. Retrieved March 20, 2024, from https://learningcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/using-concept-maps/

A continuous variable is a measure score in which each individual value for the measure can fall anywhere along a continuous scale and aggregated using a variety of methods such as the calculation of a mean or median (for example, mean number of minutes between presentation of chest pain to the time of administration of thrombolytics).

The Clinical Quality Framework (CQF) is a joint effort by the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) and Clinical Quality Information Work Groups who develop standards and guidelines that allow healthcare organizations to reliably measure care quality electronically, ensuring consistency, interoperability, and actionable insights.

The Clinical Quality Framework (CQF) Ruler is a collection of plugins built for the HAPI Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®) Java Persistence API (JPA) server that brings the FHIR Clinical Reasoning Module to life. It enables healthcare organizations and developers to process electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs), evaluate decision logic, and apply clinical rules in real time. Beyond quality measurement, the CQF Ruler acts as a central repository for knowledge artifacts, such as care guidelines and decision support rules, and serves as a clinical decision support service that can provide actionable recommendations at the point of care. By combining measure processing, knowledge management, and decision support, the CQF Ruler helps make quality reporting and evidence-based care more efficient, consistent, and interoperable across FHIR-enabled systems. 

Clinical Quality Language (CQL) is a Health Level Seven International® Normative Standard and it is part of the effort to harmonize standards between electronic clinical quality measures and clinical decision support. CQL provides the ability to express logic that is human readable yet structured enough for processing a query electronically.

The Clinical Quality Language (CQL) Evaluation Engine is an open source Java-based evaluation engine capable of evaluating the result of any CQL expression. Note: this is a component in the CQL translator repository.

Clinical Quality Language (CQL) Execution Framework is the engine that runs the rules and expressions defined in CQL to evaluate electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs), decision support logic, or other healthcare-related computations.

The Clinical Quality Language (CQL) Formatting and Usage Wiki is a collaborative workspace for the development of CQL formatting conventions and usage patterns for the representation of logic within quality measures. All users have editing rights, able to submit edits, add comments and concerns. Items on the Wiki are a work in progress and subject to change.

A Clinical Quality Language (CQL) library is a container for artifact logic/expressions. A CQL library contains declarations which specify the items found in the library. Every electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) has at least one CQL library. For more information, see the Health Level Seven International® CQL Author’s Guide.

Clinical Quality Language (CQL) Runner is an online platform for ad hoc testing of CQL.

The CQL-to-ELM Translator is an open-source reference implementation that translates the high-level Clinical Quality Language (CQL) syntax into the Expression Logical Model (ELM) representation. The reference implementation is used in support of Clinical Quality Framework implementations as a tool to enable CQL output to be uniformly and automatically translated into ELM XML or JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) documents for sharing and distribution to support implementation, integration, translation, and execution of CQL-based artifacts.

For more information or to get involved, visit the Clinical Quality Framework initiative page on the Health Level Seven International® website.

The CQMCommonQDM Library (formerly known as the Global Common Library) is a shared, standardized library of Clinical Quality Language (CQL) expressions built on the Quality Data Model (QDM).

It is used by electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) developers to:

• Reuse common logic across multiple measures
• Promote consistency and alignment in measure specifications
• Reduce duplication of code and logic
• Improve efficiency during measure development and maintenance

Instead of each eCQM defining similar logic independently), the CQMCommonQDM Library provides centralized, reusable CQL components that can be referenced across measures.

The CQMCommonQDM Library specifications can be found within the eCQMs section in the eCQM Resources tab for the specific program (e.g., Eligible Clinician eCQMs).

A Critical Access Hospital (CAH) is a hospital in a federal program established in 1997 as part of the Balanced Budget Act designed to promote rural health planning, network development, and improve access to health services for rural residents. CAHs represent a separate provider type with their own Medicare Conditions of Participation (CoP) and a separate payment method. The Code of Federal Regulations lists the CoPs for CAHs at 42 CFR 485 subpart F.

Crucible is a suite of open-source testing tools for Health Level Seven International® Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®). It helps the FHIR development community ensure correct FHIR implementations. Crucible can test for conformance to the FHIR standards, score patient records for completeness, generate synthetic patient data, and test SMART on FHIR applications.

Cypress, with the fully integrated Cypress Validation Utility + Calculation Check (CVU+), is an open source testing tool used by vendors to certify their electronic health records (EHRs) and health information technology (IT) modules for calculating electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs). Cypress is an official testing tool for the ONC Health IT EHR Certification Program. Testing involves Cypress generating synthetic patient records for the subset of published eCQMs selected for certification and testing the ability of the health IT modules to accurately record, import, calculate, filter, and report eCQMs.

The Cypress Tech Talks are an open forum for discussing technical implementation and tool issues with the Cypress support team.