Back to top
Top
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Global Malnutrition Composite Score

Measure Information
eCQM Compare View

Compare Versions of: "Global Malnutrition Composite Score"

The Compare function compares two years of the measure specifications found in the header of the measure's HTML. It does not include a comparison of any information in the body of the HTML, e.g., population criteria, Clinical Quality Language, or value sets.

Strikethrough text highlighted in red indicates information changed from the previous version. Text highlighted in green indicates information updated in the new eCQM version.

Compare version to

Table Options
Measure Information 2024 Reporting Period 2025 Reporting Period 2026 Reporting Period 2028 Reporting Period
Title Global Malnutrition Composite Score Global Malnutrition Composite Score Malnutrition Care Score Malnutrition Care Score
CMS eCQM ID CMS986v2 CMS986v4 CMS986v5 CMS986v6
Short Name

GMCS

GMCS

MCS

CBE ID* 3592e 3592e 3592e 3592e
Measure Steward Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Description

This measure assesses the percentage of hospitalizations of adults aged 65 years and older at the start of the inpatient encounter during the measurement period, with a length of stay equal to or greater than 24 hours, who received optimal malnutrition care where care performed was appropriate to the patient's level of malnutrition risk and severity. Malnutrition care best practices recommend that for each hospitalization, adult inpatients are (1) screened for malnutrition risk or for a hospital dietitian referral order to be placed, (2) assessed by a registered dietitian (RD) or registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) to confirm findings of malnutrition risk, and if identified with a "moderate" or "severe" malnutrition status in the current performed malnutrition assessment, (3) receive a "moderate" or "severe" malnutrition diagnosis by a physician or eligible provider as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and (4) have a current nutrition care plan performed by an RD/RDN.

This measure assesses the percentage of eligible encounters of adults aged 18 years and older at the start of the eligible encounter during the measurement period, with a length of stay equal to or greater than 24 hours, who received optimal malnutrition care where care performed was appropriate to the patient's level of malnutrition risk and severity. Malnutrition care best practices recommend that for each eligible encounter, adult inpatients are (1) screened for malnutrition risk or for a dietitian referral order to be placed, (2) assessed by a registered dietitian (RD) or registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) to confirm findings of malnutrition risk, and if identified with a "moderate" or "severe" malnutrition status in the current performed nutrition assessment, (3) receive a "moderate" or "severe" malnutrition diagnosis by a physician or eligible clinician as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and (4) have a current nutrition care plan performed by an RD/RDN.

This measure assesses the percentage of eligible encounters of adults aged 18 years and older at the start of the eligible encounter during the measurement period, with a length of stay equal to or greater than 24 hours, who received optimal malnutrition care where care performed was appropriate to the patient's level of malnutrition risk and severity. Malnutrition care best practices recommend that for each eligible encounter, adult inpatients (1) are screened for malnutrition risk or for a dietitian referral order to be placed, (2) are assessed by a registered dietitian (RD) or registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) to confirm findings of malnutrition risk, and if identified with a "moderate" or "severe" malnutrition status in the current performed nutrition assessment, (3) receive a "moderate" or "severe" malnutrition diagnosis by a physician or eligible clinician as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and (4) have a current nutrition care plan performed by an RD/RDN.

Measure Scoring Continuous Variable Continuous Variable Continuous Variable Continuous Variable
Measure Type Intermediate Clinical Outcome Intermediate Clinical Outcome Intermediate Outcome Intermediate Outcome
Stratification

None

None

None

Risk Adjustment

None

None

None

Rationale

The components of this measure are supported by clinical guidance that recommends the following: (1) malnutrition screening for patients admitted into the acute inpatient care setting; (2) nutrition assessment for patients identified at risk for malnutrition or with a hospital dietitian referral order to form the basis for appropriate nutrition interventions; (3) appropriate recognition, diagnosis, and documentation of the nutrition status of a patient in order to (4) address their condition with an appropriate plan of care and communicate patient needs to other care providers (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017).

The process for risk identification, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition necessitates a multi-disciplinary care team that begins with the identification of an initial risk population for a more thorough assessment by the RD/RDN. The RD/RDN, in turn, provides the necessary treatment recommendations to address nutritional status utilizing a nutrition diagnosis and care plan, along with the clinical indicators that inform a medical diagnosis of malnutrition completed by a physician or eligible provider as defined by CMS. The four measure observations individually will only provide a fraction of the necessary information on quality of care for patients at risk for or with malnutrition. For example, knowing which patients have been assessed out of those who were initially identified as at risk, but not knowing if the appropriate proportion of patients were screened upon admission, would be an insufficient assessment of quality of care.

Implementation of this measure supports timely malnutrition risk screening and hand off to RDNs for appropriate nutrition assessment for identified patients during the current hospitalization. For patients identified with a moderate or severe malnutrition by the nutrition assessment, best practice also recommends a medical diagnosis by a physician or other eligible clinician and the execution of the nutrition care plan by an RD/RDN. Evidence demonstrates that implementing a standardized protocol for screening, assessment, diagnosis, and care planning results in better identification of malnourished patients and subsequent improvements in rates of associated nutrition interventions. Outcomes modeling, and those reported in other studies, also demonstrate the benefits to patient outcomes, including reduced risk of 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stays, and complications, as well as improved quality of life after hospitalization (Sriram, 2017).

Malnutrition has been documented in approximately one-third of patients in developed countries upon admission to the hospital, and, if left untreated, can significantly impact important clinical outcomes (Mogensen et al., 2019). Adult patients with malnutrition have a significantly longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (Hudson, Chittams, Griffith, & Compher, 2018 and Mosquera et al., 2016) and significantly more patients with malnutrition have a LOS of greater than 7 days when compared to their well-nourished counterparts. Additionally, both higher rates of 30-day readmission and a significantly higher likelihood of 30-day readmission are observed in these patients (Mogensen et al., 2019; Hiller, Shaw, & Fabri, 2016; Mosquera et al., 2016). Lastly, hospitalized adults with malnutrition have an increased likelihood of death within 90 days of discharge (Hiller, Shaw, & Fabri, 2016). These consequences demonstrate the importance of addressing malnutrition in hospitalized patients to improve outcomes.

The components of this measure are supported by clinical guidance that recommends (1) malnutrition screening for patients admitted into the acute inpatient care setting; (2) nutrition assessment for patients identified at risk for malnutrition or with a dietitian referral order to form the basis for appropriate nutrition interventions; (3) appropriate recognition, diagnosis, and documentation of the nutrition status of a patient in order to (4) address their condition with an appropriate plan of care and communicate patient needs to other care providers (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017).

The process for risk identification, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition necessitates a multi-disciplinary care team that begins with the identification of an initial risk population for a more thorough assessment by the RD/RDN. The RD/RDN, in turn, provides the necessary treatment recommendations to address nutrition problems utilizing a nutrition diagnosis and care plan, along with the clinical indicators that inform a medical diagnosis of malnutrition completed by a physician or eligible clinician as defined by CMS. The four measure observations individually provide a portion of the necessary information on the quality of care for patients at risk for or with malnutrition. Therefore, the four components are summed and averaged according to a patient’s degree of malnutrition and/or malnutrition risk to determine an encounter-level Malnutrition Care Score.

High performance on this measure requires malnutrition risk screening and/or referral to RDNs for appropriate nutrition assessment for identified patients during the current hospitalization. For patients identified with moderate or severe malnutrition by the nutrition assessment, best practice also recommends a medical diagnosis by a physician or other eligible clinician and the execution of the nutrition care plan by an RD/RDN. Evidence demonstrates that implementing a standardized protocol for screening, assessment, diagnosis, and care planning results in better identification of patients with malnutrition and subsequent improvements in rates of associated nutrition interventions. Outcomes modeling demonstrates benefits to patient outcomes, including reduced risk of 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stays, and complications, as well as improved quality of life after hospitalization (Sriram et al., 2016).

Malnutrition has been documented in approximately one-third of patients in developed countries upon admission to the hospital, and, if left untreated, can significantly impact important clinical outcomes (Mogensen et al., 2019). Adult patients with malnutrition have a significantly longer hospital length of stay (LOS) and a significantly higher likelihood of 30-day readmission when compared to their well-nourished counterparts (Lengfelder et al., 2022). Furthermore, hospitalized adults with malnutrition have an increased likelihood of all-cause mortality within 2 years of diagnosis (Trollebø et al., 2024) and an increase in in-hospital death when compared to patients without a diagnosis of malnutrition (Compher et al., 2024). These consequences demonstrate the importance of addressing malnutrition in hospitalized patients to improve outcomes.

The components of this measure are supported by clinical guidance which recommend (1) malnutrition screening for patients admitted into the acute inpatient care setting; (2) nutrition assessment for patients identified at risk for malnutrition or with a dietitian referral order to form the basis for appropriate nutrition interventions; and (3) appropriate recognition, diagnosis, and documentation of the nutrition status of a patient in order to (4) address their condition with an appropriate plan of care and communicate patient needs to other care providers (Swan et al., 2019).

The process for risk identification, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition necessitates a multi-disciplinary care team that begins with the identification of an initial risk population for a more thorough assessment by the RD/RDN. The RD/RDN, in turn, provides the necessary treatment recommendations to address nutrition problems utilizing a nutrition diagnosis and care plan, along with the clinical indicators that inform a medical diagnosis of malnutrition completed by a physician or eligible clinician as defined by CMS. The four measure observations individually provide a portion of the necessary information on the quality of care for patients at risk for or with malnutrition. Therefore, the four components are summed and averaged according to a patient’s degree of malnutrition and/or malnutrition risk to determine an encounter-level Malnutrition Care Score.

High performance on this measure requires malnutrition risk screening and/or referral to RDNs for appropriate nutrition assessment for identified patients during the current hospitalization. For patients identified with moderate or severe malnutrition by nutrition assessment, best practice also recommends a medical diagnosis by a physician or other eligible clinician and the execution of the nutrition care plan by an RD/RDN. Evidence demonstrates that malnutrition pathways, which include a standardized protocol for screening, assessment, diagnosis, and care planning results in improved patient outcomes for malnourished patients (Pacetti et al., 2025).

Clinical Recommendation Statement

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines on nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults indicate that screening for nutrition risk is suggested for hospitalized patients (Mueller, et al., 2011).

This guideline places nutrition assessment and screening in the context of intervention as part of nutrition care. Screening those individuals at risk for malnutrition is the first step in nutrition care as risk for malnutrition, identified by nutrition screening, is associated with longer length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality. Malnutrition screening is also a predictor of mortality risk.

Malnourished patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more complications and longer hospitalizations than do patients with optimal nutrition status. Such patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more infectious and noninfectious complications, longer hospital length of stay, and greater mortality.

Nutrition intervention is recommended for patients identified by assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished. Nutrition intervention with associated monitoring and evaluation plants in patients identified as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished improves clinical outcomes. Nutrition interventions and their associated monitoring and evaluation plans in malnourished patients are associated with improved nutrition status, nutrient intake, physical function, and quality of life. Hospital readmissions, inpatient length of stay, and complications were reduced with increased nutrition support interventions.

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines on nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults indicate that screening for nutrition risk is suggested for hospitalized patients (Mueller, Compher, Druyan, & ASPEN Board of Directors, 2011).

This guideline places nutrition assessment and screening in the context of intervention as part of nutrition care. Screening those individuals at risk for malnutrition is the first step in nutrition care as risk for malnutrition, identified by nutrition screening, is associated with longer length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality. Malnutrition screening is also a predictor of mortality risk.

Malnourished patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more complications and longer hospitalizations than do patients with optimal nutrition status. Such patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more infectious and noninfectious complications, longer hospital length of stay, and greater mortality. Nutrition intervention is recommended for patients identified by assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished.

Nutrition intervention with associated monitoring and evaluation plans in patients identified as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished improves clinical outcomes. Nutrition interventions and their associated monitoring and evaluation plans in malnourished patients are associated with improved nutrition status, nutrient intake, physical function, and quality of life. Hospital readmissions, inpatient length of stay, and complications were reduced with increased nutrition support interventions.

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines on nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults indicate that screening for nutrition risk is suggested for hospitalized patients (Mueller et al., 2011). This guideline places nutrition assessment and screening in the context of intervention as part of nutrition care. Screening those individuals at risk for malnutrition is the first step in nutrition care, as malnutrition risk, identified by nutrition screening, is associated with longer length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality. Malnutrition screening is also a predictor of mortality risk.

Additionally, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics-ASPEN Indicators of Malnutrition (AAIM) provides a framework with significant validity in diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients and supporting evidence that suggests that malnourished patients have more complications, longer hospitalizations, greater incidence of 30-day readmission, and higher incidence of mortality than patients with optimal nutrition status (Compher et al., 2024; Jimenez et al., 2024).

Nutrition intervention is recommended for patients identified by assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished. Nutrition intervention with associated monitoring and evaluation plans in patients identified as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished improves clinical outcomes. Nutrition interventions and their associated monitoring and evaluation plans in malnourished patients are associated with improved nutrition status, nutrient intake, physical function, and quality of life. Hospital readmissions, inpatient length of stay, and complications are reduced with increased nutrition support interventions.

Improvement Notation

Higher score indicates better quality of care.

Increased score indicates improvement

Increased score indicates improvement

Definition

Malnutrition Risk Screening - the process of identifying and referring those individuals and populations who are at risk for nutrition-related problems, are appropriate for nutrition care services, and would benefit from nutrition interventions. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Risk Screening can be completed by any eligible healthcare clinician as defined by local, state and federal guidelines.

Nutrition Assessment - a systematic approach for collecting, classifying, and synthesizing important and relevant data to describe nutritional status related nutritional problems, and their causes. This assessment includes review of the "whole" patient and evaluates the anthropometrics (i.e., body measurements and proportions), biochemical data (i.e., laboratory findings), clinical observations, and diet history (also known as 'ABCD'). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Nutrition Assessment is performed by a RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Diagnosis - a documented diagnosis that identifies and describes a specific nutrition problem(s) that can be resolved or improved through nutrition intervention(s), monitoring, and evaluation. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Diagnosis is identified by the physician or other eligible clinician as defined by CMS based on the scope of practice regulations within the respective state, commonwealth, or territory of care delivery.

Nutrition Care Plan - a documented plan based on information collected during the Nutrition Assessment of individualized nutrition recommendations, interventions, and monitoring and evaluation plans that are directed toward resolving the Malnutrition Diagnosis by altering or eliminating the nutrition etiology. The Nutrition Care Plan may encompass the interventions of Food and Nutrient Delivery, Nutrition Education, Nutrition Counseling, Coordination of Nutrition Care, and Population Based Nutrition Action, along with a plan for monitoring and evaluation, and is documented by the RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Risk Screening - the process of identifying and referring those individuals and populations who are at risk for nutrition-related problems, are appropriate for nutrition care services, and would benefit from nutrition interventions. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Risk Screening can be completed by any eligible healthcare clinician as defined by local, state and federal guidelines.

Nutrition Assessment - a systematic approach for collecting, classifying, and synthesizing important and relevant data to describe nutritional status related nutritional problems, and their causes. This assessment includes review of the "whole" patient and evaluates the anthropometrics (i.e., body measurements and proportions), biochemical data (i.e., laboratory findings), clinical observations, and diet history (also known as 'ABCD'). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Nutrition Assessment is performed by a RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Diagnosis - a documented diagnosis that identifies and describes a specific nutrition problem(s) that can be resolved or improved through nutrition intervention(s), monitoring, and evaluation. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Diagnosis is identified by the physician or other eligible clinician as defined by CMS based on the scope of practice regulations within the respective state, commonwealth, or territory of care delivery.

Nutrition Care Plan - a documented plan based on information collected during the Nutrition Assessment of individualized nutrition recommendations, interventions, and monitoring and evaluation plans that are directed toward resolving the Malnutrition Diagnosis by altering or eliminating the nutrition etiology. The Nutrition Care Plan may encompass the interventions of Food and Nutrient Delivery, Nutrition Education, Nutrition Counseling, Coordination of Nutrition Care, and Population Based Nutrition Action, along with a plan for monitoring and evaluation, and is documented by the RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Risk Screening - The process of identifying and referring those individuals and populations who are at risk for nutrition-related problems, are appropriate for nutrition care services, and would benefit from nutrition interventions. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Risk Screening can be completed by any eligible healthcare clinician as defined by local, state, and federal guidelines.

Nutrition Assessment - A systematic approach for collecting, classifying, and synthesizing important and relevant data to describe nutritional status, related nutritional problems, and their causes. This assessment includes review of the "whole" patient and evaluates the anthropometrics (i.e., body measurements and proportions), biochemical data (i.e., laboratory findings), clinical observations, and diet history (also known as 'ABCD'). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Nutrition Assessment is performed by an RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Diagnosis - A documented diagnosis that identifies and describes a specific nutrition problem(s) that can be resolved or improved through nutrition intervention(s), monitoring, and evaluation. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Diagnosis is identified by the physician or other eligible clinician as defined by CMS based on the scope of practice regulations within the respective state, commonwealth, or territory of care delivery.

Nutrition Care Plan - A documented plan based on information collected during the Nutrition Assessment of individualized nutrition recommendations, interventions, and monitoring and evaluation plans that are directed toward resolving the Malnutrition Diagnosis by altering or eliminating the nutrition etiology. The Nutrition Care Plan may encompass the interventions of Food and Nutrient Delivery, Nutrition Education, Nutrition Counseling, Coordination of Nutrition Care, and Population-Based Nutrition Action, along with a plan for monitoring and evaluation, and is documented by the RD or RDN.

Guidance

This measure is constructed of four clinically eligible components that are aggregated as an arithmetic average of eligible hospitalizations and expressed as a percentage. The four populations used to calculate the four components may differ and the measure observations for the four components do not need to be performed sequentially.

This eCQM is an episode-based measure. An episode is defined as each inpatient hospitalization or encounter with a length of stay of greater than or equal to 24 hours among individuals 65 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter.

This version of the eCQM uses QDM version 5.6. Please refer to the QDM page for more information on the QDM.

This measure is constructed of four clinically eligible components that are aggregated as an arithmetic average of eligible encounters and expressed as a percentage. The four populations used to calculate the four components may differ and the measure observations for the four components do not need to be performed sequentially.

This eCQM is an episode-based measure. An episode is defined as each eligible encounter with a length of stay of greater than or equal to 24 hours among individuals 18 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter.

This version of the eCQM uses QDM version 5.6. Please refer to the QDM page for more information on the QDM.

This measure is constructed of four clinically eligible components that are aggregated as an arithmetic average of eligible encounters and expressed as a percentage. The four populations used to calculate the four components may differ and the measure observations for the four components do not need to be performed sequentially.

This eCQM is an episode-based measure. An episode is defined as each eligible encounter with a length of stay of greater than or equal to 24 hours among individuals 18 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter.

This version of the eCQM uses QDM version 5.6. Please refer to the eCQI resource center (https://ecqi.healthit.gov/qdm) for more information on the QDM.

Initial Population

Inpatient hospitalizations during the measurement period with length of stay of 24 hours or more among individuals 65 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter.

Eligible encounters during the measurement period with length of stay of 24 hours or more among individuals 18 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter

Eligible encounters that end during the measurement period with length of stay of 24 hours or more among individuals 18 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter

Measure Population

Equals Initial Population

Equals Initial Population

Equals Initial Population

Measure Population Exclusion

None

Encounters with a discharge disposition for hospice care or with a hospice care order during the inpatient qualifying encounter

Encounters for patients with a discharge disposition for hospice care or with a hospice care order during the inpatient qualifying encounter

Measure Observation

There are six measure observations for this measure.

This measure is constructed of four clinically eligible components aggregated as an arithmetic average of eligible hospitalizations. A single measure population is used to calculate the "Total Malnutrition Components Score" and "Total Malnutrition Composite Score as Percentage".

Component Measure 1: Inpatient hospitalizations for patients with a current "Malnutrition Risk Screening" performed by an eligible healthcare clinician or a Hospital Dietitian Referral.

"Measure Observation 1" is "Encounters with Malnutrition Risk Screening and Identified Result or a Hospital Dietitian Referral"

"Measure Observation 1" identifies hospital encounters where a "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed or authored during the hospitalization (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters) with an identified "Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result" or "Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result". It also identifies a hospitalization where there is a Hospital Dietitian Referral, whether there is a "Malnutrition Risk Screening" performed or not.

Component Measure 2: Inpatient hospitalizations for patients with a current "Nutrition Assessment" performed by an RD/RDN, after a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result" during the current hospitalization or a "Hospital Dietitian Referral" order from a physician or eligible clinician during the current hospitalization.

"Measure Observation 2" is "Encounter with Nutrition Assessment and Identified Status"

"Measure Observation 2" identifies hospital encounters where a "Nutrition Assessment" was performed or authored during the hospitalization (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters) with an identified "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished", "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished", or "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished".

Component Measure 3: Inpatient hospitalizations for patients with a documented "Malnutrition Diagnosis" as a result of a "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished" OR "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished".

"Measure Observation 3" is "Encounters with Malnutrition Diagnosis"

"Measure Observation 3" identifies hospital encounters where a "Malnutrition Diagnosis" was active during the hospitalization (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters).

Component Measure 4: Inpatient hospitalizations for patients with a current "Nutrition Care Plan" performed as a result of a current "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished" OR current “Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished”.

“Measure Observation 4” is “Encounters with Nutrition Care Plan”

"Measure Observation 4" identifies hospital encounters where a "Nutrition Care Plan" was performed or authored during the hospitalization (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters).

"Population 5 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score" Calculations

-For each hospitalization, Population Criteria 5 represents the subtotal of Measure Observations performed for Population Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4. Possible values may be 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4.

 

"Population 5 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score" is ("Measure Observation 1" plus "Measure Observation 2" plus "Measure Observation 3" plus "Measure Observation 4")

"Population 6 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Composite Score as Percentage" Calculations:

-For each hospitalization, Population Criteria 6 represents the sum of performed Measure Observations 1, 2, 3, and 4 divided by the number of clinically eligible occurrences.

"Population 6 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Composite Score as Percentage" is 100 multiplied by ("Total Malnutrition Components Score" divided by "Total Malnutrition Composite Score Eligible Occurrences"). Possible values may be 0, 50, 75, or 100 percent.

"Total Malnutrition Composite Score Eligible Occurrences" is always 4 except in the following instances:

-The "Total Malnutrition Composite Score Eligible Occurrences" is 1 if

---A "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed and a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result" was identified AND "Hospital Dietitian Referral" was not ordered.

- The "Total Malnutrition Composite Score Eligible Occurrences" are 2

---If a "Nutrition Assessment" was performed and a "Nutrition Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished" was identified

--- A "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed and a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result" was identified AND "Hospital Dietitian Referral" was ordered OR a "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed and a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result" was identified but the “Nutrition Assessment” was not performed

-For the reporting facility, the Aggregate Operator 'Count' counts the number of eligible hospitalizations during the measurement period.

-For the reporting facility, the Aggregate Operator 'Average' averages the performance of each "Total Malnutrition Composite Score as Percentage" across all eligible hospitalizations during the measurement period.

Component Measure 1: Eligible encounters for patients with a current "Malnutrition Risk Screening" performed by an eligible healthcare clinician or a Dietitian Referral.

"Measure Observation 1" is "Encounters with Malnutrition Risk Screening and Identified Result or a Dietitian Referral"

"Measure Observation 1" identifies eligible encounters where a "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed or authored during the encounter (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters) with an identified "Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result" or "Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result". It also identifies an eligible encounter where there is a Dietitian Referral, whether there is a "Malnutrition Risk Screening" performed or not.

Component Measure 2: Eligible encounters for patients with a documented "Nutrition Assessment" performed by an RD/RDN, after a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result" or a "Dietitian Referral" order from a physician or eligible clinician during the current encounter.

"Measure Observation 2" is "Encounter With Most Recent Nutrition Assessment And Identified Status"

"Measure Observation 2" identifies eligible encounters where a "Nutrition Assessment" was performed or authored during the encounter (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters) with an identified "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished", "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished", or "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished".

Component Measure 3: Eligible encounters for patients with a documented "Malnutrition Diagnosis" based on the most recent finding of "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished" or "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished".

"Measure Observation 3" is "Encounters with Malnutrition Diagnosis"

"Measure Observation 3" identifies eligible encounters where a "Malnutrition Diagnosis" was active during the encounter (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters).

Component Measure 4: Eligible encounters for patients with a documented "Nutrition Care Plan" based on the most recent finding of "Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished" or “Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished”.

“Measure Observation 4” is “Encounters with Nutrition Care Plan”

"Measure Observation 4" identifies eligible encounters where a "Nutrition Care Plan" was performed or authored during the encounter (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters).

Population 5 "Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score" Calculations -For each eligible encounter, Population Criteria 5 represents the subtotal of Measure Observations performed for Population Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4. Possible values may be 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4.

Population 5 "Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score" is ("Measure Observation 1" plus "Measure Observation 2" plus "Measure Observation 3" plus "Measure Observation 4") Population 6 "Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Care Score as Percentage" Calculations: -For each eligible encounter, Population Criteria 6 represents the sum of performed Measure Observations 1, 2, 3, and 4 divided by the number of clinically eligible occurrences.

Population 6 "Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Care Score as Percentage" is 100 multiplied by ("Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score" divided by "Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences"). Possible values may be 0, 50, 75, or 100 percent.

"Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences" is always 4 except in the following instances:

-The "Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences" is 1 if

---A "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed and a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result" was identified and "Dietitian Referral" was not ordered.

- The "Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences" is 2

---If the most recent "Nutrition Assessment" performed has a result of "Nutrition Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished".

--- A "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed and a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result" was identified and "Dietitian Referral" was ordered or a "Malnutrition Risk Screening" was performed and a "Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result" was identified but the “Nutrition Assessment” was not performed.

Component Measure 1: Eligible encounters for patients with a current Malnutrition Risk Screening performed by an eligible healthcare clinician or with a Dietitian Referral. Measure Observation 1 is Encounters with Malnutrition Risk Screening or with a Dietitian Referral. Measure Observation 1 identifies eligible encounters where a Malnutrition Risk Screening was performed during the encounter (including associated observation or emergency department encounters) with an identified Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk or At Risk Result. It also identifies an eligible encounter where there is a Dietitian Referral, whether there is a Malnutrition Risk Screening performed or not.

Component Measure 2: Eligible encounters for patients with a documented Nutrition Assessment performed by an RD/RDN, and with a Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result or a Dietitian Referral order from a physician or eligible clinician during the current encounter. Measure Observation 2 includes Encounters with Most Recent Nutrition Assessment and Identified Status if the encounter also contains Completed Malnutrition Risk Screening or Dietitian Referral. Measure Observation 2 identifies eligible encounters in which a malnutrition risk screening with an At Risk Result or a dietitian referral was completed during the encounter (or associated observation or emergency department encounters) and a Nutrition Assessment was subsequently completed with an identified Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished, Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished, or Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished.

Component Measure 3: Eligible encounters for patients with a documented Malnutrition Diagnosis based on the most recent Nutrition Assessment Finding of Moderately Malnourished or Severely Malnourished. Measure Observation 3 includes encounters with the most recent Nutrition Assessment and Identified Status of Moderately Malnourished or Severely Malnourished, that also identified an active medical malnutrition diagnosis during the encounter (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters) and a Malnutrition Risk Screening At Risk Result or with a Dietitian Referral.

Component Measure 4: Eligible encounters for patients with a documented Nutrition Care Plan based on the most recent Nutrition Assessment Finding of Moderately Malnourished or Severely Malnourished. Measure Observation 4 identifies encounters with the most recent Nutrition Assessment and Identified Status of Moderately Malnourished or Severely Malnourished, that also include a documented Nutrition Care Plan and a Malnutrition Risk Screening At Risk Result or with a Dietitian Referral. Measure Observation 4 identifies eligible encounters where a Nutrition Care Plan was performed during the encounter (including preceding observation or emergency department encounters).

Population 5 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score Calculations: For each eligible encounter, Population Criteria 5 represents the subtotal of Measure Observations performed for Population Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4. Possible values may be 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4. Population 5 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score is (Measure Observation 1 plus Measure Observation 2 plus Measure Observation 3 plus Measure Observation 4).

Population 6 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Care Score as Percentage Calculations: For each eligible encounter, Population Criteria 6 represents the sum of performed Measure Observations 1, 2, 3, and 4 divided by the number of clinically eligible occurrences. Population 6 Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Care Score as Percentage is 100 multiplied by (Measure Observation Total Malnutrition Components Score divided by Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences). Possible values may be 0, 50, 75, or 100 percent. Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences is always 4 except in the following instances:

The Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences is 1 if:

  • A Malnutrition Risk Screening was performed, and a Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk was identified, and a Dietitian Referral was not ordered.

The Total Malnutrition Care Score Eligible Occurrences is 2 if:

  • The most recent Nutrition Assessment performed has a result of Not or Mildly Malnourished.

    And, IF:

  • A Malnutrition Risk Screening was performed and a Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk was identified, or a Dietitian Referral was ordered, or a Dietitian Referral was ordered but a Nutrition Assessment was not performed.
Next Version No Version Available
Previous Version No Version Available No Version Available
Specifications and Data Elements
General eCQM Information
Specifications
Release Notes
General eCQM Information

Header

  • Updated the eCQM version number.

    Measure Section:

    eCQM Version Number

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Changed all references from NQF to CBE to identify the consensus-based entity role.

    Measure Section:

    CBE Number

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Updated measure developer from Avalere Health to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Developer

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated Description and Measure Observation text to reflect update in timing of malnutrition diagnosis to overlap with inpatient encounter and better align with clinical practice.

    Measure Section:

    Description

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated copyright.

    Measure Section:

    Copyright

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Added a timing clause to include linked emergency and observation encounters associated with the inpatient encounter and update the narrative to reflect the logic.

    Measure Section:

    Rate Aggregation

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added the possible values for population criteria 5 and 6 to assist the users with comprehension.

    Measure Section:

    Rate Aggregation

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Removed guidance for use of LOINC code '84291-4' from the header sections as it is no longer being used.

    Measure Section:

    Rate Aggregation

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Renamed denominator function from 'Eligible Denominator' to 'Eligible Occurrence' to better align with naming conventions.

    Measure Section:

    Rate Aggregation

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated Rate Aggregation and Guidance descriptions to better reflect the logic and clarify aggregate measure calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Rate Aggregation

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Removed guidance for use of LOINC code '84291-4' from the header sections as it is no longer being used.

    Measure Section:

    Guidance

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated Rate Aggregation and Guidance descriptions to better reflect the logic and clarify aggregate measure calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Guidance

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated Description and Measure Observation text to reflect update in timing of malnutrition diagnosis to overlap with inpatient encounter and better align with clinical practice.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added the possible values for population criteria 5 and 6 to assist the users with comprehension.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added the phrase 'or a Hospital Dietitian Referral' to align with changes in logic and measure intent.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Renamed denominator function from 'Eligible Denominator' to 'Eligible Occurrence' to better align with naming conventions.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added a timing clause to include linked emergency and observation encounters associated with the inpatient encounter and updated the narrative to reflect the logic.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added the phrase 'or a Hospital Dietitian Referral' to align with changes in logic and measure intent.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated the Eligible Occurrences (prior Eligible Denominators) description to support alignment with measure intent and improve clarity.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added the phrase 'but the 'Nutrition Assessment' was not performed' for the Eligible Occurrences definitions.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated grammar, wording, and/or formatting to improve readability and consistency.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated references and measure header to reflect current evidence and new or updated literature.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

Logic

  • Updated measure logic to allow counting the Hospital Dietitian Referral Order as completion of Measure Observation 1 (Malnutrition Risk Screening) to better align with clinical practice.

    Measure Section:

    Initial Population

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added logic to prioritize 'Not at Risk' result in Malnutrition Risk Screening to prevent inaccurate calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Numerator

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated logic to prioritize 'Not/Mildly Malnourished' result in Nutrition Assessment to prevent inaccurate calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Numerator

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated the eligible occurrence function from 4 to 2 in encounters where a Nutrition Assessment was not completed to more fairly score performance.

    Measure Section:

    Measure Observations

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added logic to prioritize 'Not at Risk' result in Malnutrition Risk Screening to prevent inaccurate calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Removed redundant variable names and substituted Qualifying Encounter with Inpatient Hospitalization to support simplifying the logic and align with measure intent.

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Renamed value set to 'Payer Type' to more accurately reflect the contents and intent of the value set.

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Standards/Technical Update

  • Updated logic definition of Malnutrition Diagnosis from 'starts during' to 'overlaps' with the current inpatient encounter to better align with clinical practice.

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated logic to prioritize 'Not/Mildly Malnourished' result in Nutrition Assessment to prevent inaccurate calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated the names of CQL definitions, functions, and/or aliases for clarification and to align with the CQL Style Guide.

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Standards/Technical Update

  • Updated the version number of the Measure Authoring Tool (MAT) Global Common Functions Library to v8.0.000 and the library name from 'MATGlobalCommonFunctions' to 'MATGlobalCommonFunctionsQDM.'

    Measure Section:

    Definitions

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Renamed 'Eligible Denominator' to 'Eligible Occurrence' to better align with naming conventions.

    Measure Section:

    Functions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated the version number of the Measure Authoring Tool (MAT) Global Common Functions Library to v8.0.000 and the library name from 'MATGlobalCommonFunctions' to 'MATGlobalCommonFunctionsQDM.'

    Measure Section:

    Functions

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Updated the eligible occurrence function from 4 to 2 in encounters where a Nutrition Assessment was not completed to more fairly score performance.

    Measure Section:

    Functions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated the eligible occurrence function from 4 to 2 in encounters where a Nutrition Assessment was not completed to more fairly score performance.

    Measure Section:

    Functions

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added logic to prevent scoring of additional measure components when Not At Risk result present in Malnutrition Screening to ensure correct calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    ONC Project Tracking System (JIRA): CQM-6285

  • Updated measure logic to allow counting the Hospital Dietitian Referral Order as completion of Measure Observation 1 (Malnutrition Risk Screening) to better align with clinical practice.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Updated logic to stop additional observation performance measurement when Not At Risk result (for Malnutrition Screening) or Not Mild Malnutrition result (for Nutrition Assessment) to ensure correct calculations.

    Measure Section:

    Multiple Sections

    Source of Change:

    ONC Project Tracking System (JIRA): CQM-6142

Value Set

The VSAC is the source of truth for the value set content, please visit the VSAC for downloads of current value sets.

  • Updated Malnutrition Risk Screening value set to include normative responses.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Grouping value set Malnutrition Diagnosis (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.55): Added 4 ICD-10-CM codes (M62.84, R62.7, R64, E63.9) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback. Deleted 1 ICD-10-CM code (E45) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback. Added 18 SNOMED CT codes based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback. Deleted 1 SNOMED CT code (302872003) based on terminology update.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set Malnutrition Risk Screening (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.92): Added 1 LOINC code (101807-6) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback. Deleted 1 LOINC code (84291-4) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.38) removed as a standalone value set in the measure based on terminology update; the value set is now included in the Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result grouping value set that was added (OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.89).

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Added value set Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result (OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.89), which includes two extensional value sets: Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result (SNOMED; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.38) and Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result (LOINC; 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.94).Malnutrition Screening Finding of At Risk Result (SNOMED; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.38) was previously included in measure as a standalone extensional value set; since last measure publication, the value set was renamed and experienced code changes.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Value set (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.34): Renamed to Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set Malnutrition Screening Finding of Not At Risk Result (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.34): Added 1 LOINC code (LA33699-2) based on terminology update. Deleted 1 SNOMED CT code (36823005) based on terminology update.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Value set Nutrition Assessment (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.21): Added 1 LOINC code (101819-1) based on terminology update. Deleted 1 LOINC code (84291-4) based on terminology update.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Added value set Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished (OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.47), which includes two extensional value sets: Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished (SNOMED; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.44) and Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished (LOINC; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.98) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Added value set Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished (OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.43), which includes two extensional value sets: Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished (SNOMED; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.42) and Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished (LOINC; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.97) based on terminology update.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Added value set Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.96), which includes two extensional value sets: Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished (SNOMED; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.48) and Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished (LOINC; OID 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.95) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.44) removed as a standalone value set in the measure; the value set is now included in the Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Moderately Malnourished grouping value set that was added (OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.47) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.48) removed as a standalone value set in the measure; the value set is now included in the Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Well Nourished or Not Malnourished or Mildly Malnourished grouping value set that was added (OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.96) based on terminology update.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

  • Value set Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.42) removed as a standalone value set in the measure; the value set was renamed and is now included in the Nutrition Assessment Status Finding of Severely Malnourished grouping value set that was added (OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.43) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set Nutrition Care Plan (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1095.93): Added 1 SNOMED CT code (1279742004) based on terminology update. Added 1 SNOMED CT code (445101000124100) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback. Deleted 10 SNOMED CT codes (182922004, 418995006, 61310001, 441041000124100, 225372007, 229912004, 384760004, 435691000124100, 448556005, 709564003) based on review by technical experts, SMEs, and/or public feedback.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Measure Lead

  • Value set (2.16.840.1.114222.4.11.3591): Renamed to Payer Type based on recommended value set naming conventions.

    Measure Section:

    Terminology

    Source of Change:

    Annual Update

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025