Global Malnutrition Composite Score

None

None

None

The components of this measure are supported by clinical guidance that recommends the following: (1) malnutrition screening for patients admitted into the acute inpatient care setting; (2) nutrition assessment for patients identified at-risk of malnutrition or with a hospital dietitian referral order to form the basis for appropriate nutrition interventions; (3) appropriate recognition, diagnosis, and documentation of the nutrition status of a patient in order to (4) address their condition with an appropriate plan of care and communicate patient needs to other care providers.

The process for risk identification, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition necessitates a multi-disciplinary care team that begins with the identification of an initial risk population for a more thorough physical assessment by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDN). The RDN in turn provides the necessary treatment recommendations to address nutritional status and the clinical indicators that inform a medical diagnosis of malnutrition completed by a physician. The four component measures individually will only provide a fraction of the necessary information on quality of care for patients at-risk of malnutrition. For example, knowing which patients have been assessed out of those who were initially identified as at-risk, but not knowing if the appropriate proportion of patients were screened upon admission, would be an insufficient assessment of quality of care.

Implementation of this measure supports timely nursing malnutrition risk screening and hand off to RDNs for appropriate nutritional assessment for patients at-risk of malnutrition during the current hospitalization. For patients identified with a moderate or severe malnutrition status from the nutrition assessment, best practice also recommends a medical diagnosis by a physician or other qualified healthcare professionals and the execution of the nutrition care plan by an RDN. Evidence demonstrates that implementing a standardized protocol for screening, assessment, diagnosis and care planning results in better identification of malnourished patients and subsequent improvements in rates of nutrition intervention for the malnourished. Outcomes modeling, and those reported in other studies, also demonstrate the benefits to patient outcomes, including reduced risk of 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stay, and complications, as well as improved quality of life after hospitalization.

The components of this measure are supported by clinical guidance that recommends the following: (1) malnutrition screening for patients admitted into the acute inpatient care setting; (2) nutrition assessment for patients identified at risk for malnutrition or with a hospital dietitian referral order to form the basis for appropriate nutrition interventions; (3) appropriate recognition, diagnosis, and documentation of the nutrition status of a patient in order to (4) address their condition with an appropriate plan of care and communicate patient needs to other care providers (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017).

The process for risk identification, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition necessitates a multi-disciplinary care team that begins with the identification of an initial risk population for a more thorough assessment by the RD/RDN. The RD/RDN, in turn, provides the necessary treatment recommendations to address nutritional status utilizing a nutrition diagnosis and care plan, along with the clinical indicators that inform a medical diagnosis of malnutrition completed by a physician or eligible provider as defined by CMS. The four measure observations individually will only provide a fraction of the necessary information on quality of care for patients at risk for or with malnutrition. For example, knowing which patients have been assessed out of those who were initially identified as at risk, but not knowing if the appropriate proportion of patients were screened upon admission, would be an insufficient assessment of quality of care.

Implementation of this measure supports timely malnutrition risk screening and hand off to RDNs for appropriate nutrition assessment for identified patients during the current hospitalization. For patients identified with a moderate or severe malnutrition by the nutrition assessment, best practice also recommends a medical diagnosis by a physician or other eligible clinician and the execution of the nutrition care plan by an RD/RDN. Evidence demonstrates that implementing a standardized protocol for screening, assessment, diagnosis, and care planning results in better identification of malnourished patients and subsequent improvements in rates of associated nutrition interventions. Outcomes modeling, and those reported in other studies, also demonstrate the benefits to patient outcomes, including reduced risk of 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stays, and complications, as well as improved quality of life after hospitalization (Sriram, 2017).

The components of this measure are supported by clinical guidance that recommends the following: (1) malnutrition screening for patients admitted into the acute inpatient care setting; (2) nutrition assessment for patients identified at risk for malnutrition or with a hospital dietitian referral order to form the basis for appropriate nutrition interventions; (3) appropriate recognition, diagnosis, and documentation of the nutrition status of a patient in order to (4) address their condition with an appropriate plan of care and communicate patient needs to other care providers (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017).

The process for risk identification, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition necessitates a multi-disciplinary care team that begins with the identification of an initial risk population for a more thorough assessment by the RD/RDN. The RD/RDN, in turn, provides the necessary treatment recommendations to address nutritional status utilizing a nutrition diagnosis and care plan, along with the clinical indicators that inform a medical diagnosis of malnutrition completed by a physician or eligible provider as defined by CMS. The four measure observations individually will only provide a fraction of the necessary information on quality of care for patients at risk for or with malnutrition. For example, knowing which patients have been assessed out of those who were initially identified as at risk, but not knowing if the appropriate proportion of patients were screened upon admission, would be an insufficient assessment of quality of care.

Implementation of this measure supports timely malnutrition risk screening and hand off to RDNs for appropriate nutrition assessment for identified patients during the current hospitalization. For patients identified with a moderate or severe malnutrition by the nutrition assessment, best practice also recommends a medical diagnosis by a physician or other eligible clinician and the execution of the nutrition care plan by an RD/RDN. Evidence demonstrates that implementing a standardized protocol for screening, assessment, diagnosis, and care planning results in better identification of malnourished patients and subsequent improvements in rates of associated nutrition interventions. Outcomes modeling, and those reported in other studies, also demonstrate the benefits to patient outcomes, including reduced risk of 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stays, and complications, as well as improved quality of life after hospitalization (Sriram, 2017).

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) clinical guidelines on nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults, Screening for nutrition risk is suggested for hospitalized patients. (A.S.P.E.N., 2011).

This guideline places nutrition assessment and screening in the context of intervention as part of nutrition care. Screening those individuals at risk of malnutrition is the first step in nutrition care as nutrition risk, identified by nutrition screening, is associated with longer length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality. Malnutrition screening is also a predictor of mortality risk.

Nutrition assessment is suggested for all patients who are identified to be at malnutrition risk by nutrition screening. Malnourished patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more complications and longer hospitalizations than do patients with optimal nutrition status. Such patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more infectious and noninfectious complications, longer hospital length of stay, and greater mortality.

Nutrition support intervention is recommended for patients identified by assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished. Nutrition support intervention in patients identified assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished improves clinical outcomes. Nutrition interventions in malnourished patients are associated with improved nutrition status, nutrient intake, physical function, and quality of life. Hospital readmissions, inpatient length of stay, and complications were reduced with increased nutrition support interventions.

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines on nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults indicate that screening for nutrition risk is suggested for hospitalized patients (Mueller, et al., 2011).

This guideline places nutrition assessment and screening in the context of intervention as part of nutrition care. Screening those individuals at risk for malnutrition is the first step in nutrition care as risk for malnutrition, identified by nutrition screening, is associated with longer length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality. Malnutrition screening is also a predictor of mortality risk.

Malnourished patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more complications and longer hospitalizations than do patients with optimal nutrition status. Such patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more infectious and noninfectious complications, longer hospital length of stay, and greater mortality.

Nutrition intervention is recommended for patients identified by assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished. Nutrition intervention with associated monitoring and evaluation plants in patients identified as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished improves clinical outcomes. Nutrition interventions and their associated monitoring and evaluation plans in malnourished patients are associated with improved nutrition status, nutrient intake, physical function, and quality of life. Hospital readmissions, inpatient length of stay, and complications were reduced with increased nutrition support interventions.

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines on nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults indicate that screening for nutrition risk is suggested for hospitalized patients (Mueller, et al., 2011).

This guideline places nutrition assessment and screening in the context of intervention as part of nutrition care. Screening those individuals at risk for malnutrition is the first step in nutrition care as risk for malnutrition, identified by nutrition screening, is associated with longer length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality. Malnutrition screening is also a predictor of mortality risk.

Malnourished patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more complications and longer hospitalizations than do patients with optimal nutrition status. Such patients, identified by nutrition assessment tools, have more infectious and noninfectious complications, longer hospital length of stay, and greater mortality.

Nutrition intervention is recommended for patients identified by assessment as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished. Nutrition intervention with associated monitoring and evaluation plants in patients identified as at risk for malnutrition or malnourished improves clinical outcomes. Nutrition interventions and their associated monitoring and evaluation plans in malnourished patients are associated with improved nutrition status, nutrient intake, physical function, and quality of life. Hospital readmissions, inpatient length of stay, and complications were reduced with increased nutrition support interventions.

Malnutrition Risk Screening - the process of identifying and referring those individuals and populations who are at risk for nutrition-related problems, are appropriate for nutrition care services, and would benefit from the nutrition interventions. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Risk Screening is performed by a nursing professional, Registered Dietitian (RD), or Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN).

Nutrition Assessment - a systematic approach for collecting, classifying, and synthesizing important and relevant data to describe nutritional status related nutritional problems, and their causes. This assessment includes review of the "whole" patient and evaluates the anthropometrics (i.e., body measurements and proportions), biochemical data (i.e., laboratory findings), clinical observations, and diet history (also known as 'ABCD'). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Nutrition Assessment is performed by a RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Diagnosis - a documented diagnosis that identifies and describes a specific nutrition problem(s) that can be resolved or improved through nutrition intervention(s). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Diagnosis is identified by the physician/eligible clinician based on the scope of practice regulations within the respective state, commonwealth, or territory of care delivery.

Nutrition Care Plan - a documented plan based on information collected during the Nutrition Assessment of individualized nutrition recommendations and interventions that are directed toward resolving the Malnutrition Diagnosis by altering or eliminating the nutrition etiology. The Nutrition Care Plan may encompass the interventions of Food and Nutrient Delivery, Nutrition Education, Nutrition Counseling, Coordination of Nutrition Care, and Population Based Nutrition Action, and is documented by the RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Risk Screening - the process of identifying and referring those individuals and populations who are at risk for nutrition-related problems, are appropriate for nutrition care services, and would benefit from nutrition interventions. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Risk Screening can be completed by any eligible healthcare clinician as defined by local, state and federal guidelines.

Nutrition Assessment - a systematic approach for collecting, classifying, and synthesizing important and relevant data to describe nutritional status related nutritional problems, and their causes. This assessment includes review of the "whole" patient and evaluates the anthropometrics (i.e., body measurements and proportions), biochemical data (i.e., laboratory findings), clinical observations, and diet history (also known as 'ABCD'). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Nutrition Assessment is performed by a RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Diagnosis - a documented diagnosis that identifies and describes a specific nutrition problem(s) that can be resolved or improved through nutrition intervention(s), monitoring, and evaluation. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Diagnosis is identified by the physician or other eligible clinician as defined by CMS based on the scope of practice regulations within the respective state, commonwealth, or territory of care delivery.

Nutrition Care Plan - a documented plan based on information collected during the Nutrition Assessment of individualized nutrition recommendations, interventions, and monitoring and evaluation plans that are directed toward resolving the Malnutrition Diagnosis by altering or eliminating the nutrition etiology. The Nutrition Care Plan may encompass the interventions of Food and Nutrient Delivery, Nutrition Education, Nutrition Counseling, Coordination of Nutrition Care, and Population Based Nutrition Action, along with a plan for monitoring and evaluation, and is documented by the RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Risk Screening - the process of identifying and referring those individuals and populations who are at risk for nutrition-related problems, are appropriate for nutrition care services, and would benefit from nutrition interventions. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Risk Screening can be completed by any eligible healthcare clinician as defined by local, state and federal guidelines.

Nutrition Assessment - a systematic approach for collecting, classifying, and synthesizing important and relevant data to describe nutritional status related nutritional problems, and their causes. This assessment includes review of the "whole" patient and evaluates the anthropometrics (i.e., body measurements and proportions), biochemical data (i.e., laboratory findings), clinical observations, and diet history (also known as 'ABCD'). For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Nutrition Assessment is performed by a RD or RDN.

Malnutrition Diagnosis - a documented diagnosis that identifies and describes a specific nutrition problem(s) that can be resolved or improved through nutrition intervention(s), monitoring, and evaluation. For the inpatient or acute care setting, the Malnutrition Diagnosis is identified by the physician or other eligible clinician as defined by CMS based on the scope of practice regulations within the respective state, commonwealth, or territory of care delivery.

Nutrition Care Plan - a documented plan based on information collected during the Nutrition Assessment of individualized nutrition recommendations, interventions, and monitoring and evaluation plans that are directed toward resolving the Malnutrition Diagnosis by altering or eliminating the nutrition etiology. The Nutrition Care Plan may encompass the interventions of Food and Nutrient Delivery, Nutrition Education, Nutrition Counseling, Coordination of Nutrition Care, and Population Based Nutrition Action, along with a plan for monitoring and evaluation, and is documented by the RD or RDN.

Valid Encounter: Inpatient hospitalizations during the measurement period with length of stay of 24 hours or more among individuals 65 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter

Inpatient hospitalizations during the measurement period with length of stay of 24 hours or more among individuals 65 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter.

Inpatient hospitalizations during the measurement period with length of stay of 24 hours or more among individuals 18 years of age and older at the start of the inpatient encounter.

Equals Initial Population

Equals Initial Population

Equals Initial Population

None

None

None