HIV Annual Retention in Care
Compare Versions of: "HIV Annual Retention in Care"
The Compare function compares two years of the measure specifications found in the header of the measure's HTML. It does not include a comparison of any information in the body of the HTML, e.g., population criteria, Clinical Quality Language, or value sets.
Strikethrough text highlighted in red indicates information changed from the previous version. Text highlighted in green indicates information updated in the new eCQM version.
Compare version to
| Measure Information | 2025 Performance Period |
|---|---|
| Title | HIV Annual Retention in Care |
| CMS eCQM ID | CMS1157v1 |
| CBE ID* | Not Applicable |
| MIPS Quality ID | 340 |
| Measure Steward | Health Resources & Services Administration |
| Description |
Percentage of patients, regardless of age, with a diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) during the first 240 days of the measurement period or before the measurement period who had at least two eligible encounters or at least one eligible encounter and one HIV viral load test that were at least 90 days apart within the measurement period |
| Measure Scoring | Proportion measure |
| Measure Type | Process |
| Stratification |
None |
| Risk Adjustment |
None |
| Rationale |
The HIV "continuum of care" is the process of HIV testing, linkage to HIV care, initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), adherence to treatment, retention in care, and virologic suppression (Gardner et al 2011). Poor retention in care is associated with lower rates of ART use (Giordano et al 2003), delayed viral suppression (Crawford et al 2014), and increased risk of mortality (Giordano et al., 2007; Mugavero et al., 2009). This measure will help providers direct their attention and quality improvement efforts towards improving retention in care. |
| Clinical Recommendation Statement |
"Retention in care should be routinely monitored. There are various ways to measure retention, including measures based on attended visits over a defined period of time (constancy measures) and measures based on missed visits. Both approaches are valid and independently predict survival. Missed visits and a prolonged time since the last visit are relatively easy to measure and should trigger efforts to retain or re-engage a person in care. Constancy measures (e.g., at least two visits that are at least 90 days apart over 1 year or at least one visit every 6 months over the last 2 years) can be used as clinic quality assurance measures" (Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents, 2022, p. L-4). "Poor retention in HIV care is associated with greater risk of death. Poor retention is more common in people who use substances, have serious mental health problems, have unmet socioeconomic needs (e.g., housing, food, transportation), lack financial resources or health insurance, have schedules that complicate adherence, have been recently incarcerated, or face stigma. At the provider and health system level, low trust in providers and a poor patient-provider relationship have been associated with lower retention, as has lower satisfaction with the clinic experience. Availability of appointments and timeliness of appointments (i.e., long delay from the request for an appointment to the appointment's date) and scheduling convenience are also factors" (Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents, 2022, p. L-3). "Recommendation 2: Systematic monitoring of retention in HIV care is recommended for all patients (II A): Retention in care is associated with improved individual health outcomes, including HIV biomarker and clinical variables, and may reduce community-level viral burden, with implications for secondary prevention. Although monitoring retention is routinely recommended, specific details, such as retention measures to be used and desired visit frequency, vary among jurisdictions and programs and should be in harmony with national and international guidelines. Many retention measures (for example, visit adherence, gaps in care, and visits per interval of time) and data sources (for example, surveillance, medical records, and administrative databases) have been used and may be applied in accordance with local resources and standards of care. As with monitoring of linkage, integration of data sources may enhance monitoring of retention" (Thompson et al., 2012, p. 4). |
| Improvement Notation |
Higher score equals better quality |
| Definition |
To maintain consistency from year to year, this measure defines one month as equal to 30 days, three months as equal to 90 days and eight months as equal to 240 days. Only patients with an eligible encounter in the first eight months are included in this measure to allow for sufficient time to complete a second eligible encounter or viral load laboratory within the 12-month measurement period and at least 90 days after the initial encounter. |
| Guidance |
A patient would be included in the measure numerator if they have either two eligible encounters or one eligible encounter and one viral load test at least 90 days apart from each other. The encounter or encounters that cause a patient to be included in the numerator do not need to include the encounter that caused the patient to be included in the denominator. This eCQM is a patient-based measure. This measure is to be submitted a minimum of once per measurement period for patients with a diagnosis of HIV during the first eight months of the measurement period. This version of the eCQM uses QDM version 5.6. Please refer to the QDM page for more information on the QDM. |
| Initial Population |
All patients, regardless of age, with a diagnosis of HIV during the first 240 days of the measurement period or before the measurement period who had at least one eligible encounter during the first 240 days of the measurement period |
| Denominator |
Equals Initial Population |
| Denominator Exclusions |
None |
| Numerator |
Number of patients who had at least one eligible encounter and one HIV viral load test at least 90 days apart during the measurement period, or who had at least two eligible encounters at least 90 days apart during the measurement period |
| Numerator Exclusions |
Not Applicable |
| Denominator Exceptions |
None |
| Telehealth Eligible | Yes |
| Next Version | No Version Available |
| Previous Version | No Version Available |